Arthrophycus alleghaniensis
A trace
fossil from the Silurian Tuscarora Fm., Ridge and Valley Province,
Central PA
Arthrophycus
alleghaniensis (scale: long bar 4 in) |
Arthrophycus
alleghaniensis,
an Early Silurian trace fossil, covers the base of
a sandstone bed from the Tuscarora
Formation.
The critter making these burrows lived some 435
million years ago. |
A closer view illustrates the branching nature of the
Arthrophycus
alleghaniensis
burrows, many of which display strongly defined ridges
oriented at right angles to the long axis of the burrow. |
Arthrophycus alleghaniensis
(scale: long bar 4 in) |
|
In
the upper, yellowish-gray unit, Arthrophycus
burrows extend below the base of the bed and cut into the
darker, lower unit.
Yellow-brown line
approximates bed contact.
In
the lower, gray shaly unit, horizontal burrows appear as
lighter ovals and masses (circled). |
Closer
view of Arthrophycus extending into the lower shaly
unit. These
trace fossils occur in a Tuscarora Fm. exposure in the
Lewistown Narrows in the recently cut north bench along PA
Route 22/322. |
|
Arthrophycus alleghaniensis
FAQs |
What is
Arthrophycus
alleghaniensis
?
Arthrophycus
is the name paleontologists assigned to a group of
trace fossils that range from single to compound elongate
burrows displaying transversely annulated (ringed or banded)
markings.
Arthrophycus alleghaniensis
applies to those compound, fan-like
assemblages of annulated burrows appearing on the bases of
sandstone beds. This fossil was first described in
1831 observed on an ornamental slab of rock in front of a
tavern at the base of Shade Mountain, Mifflin Co., PA (Rindsberg
and Martin, 2003, p. 202-203).
|
What are trace
fossils?
Trace fossils
(1,
2,
3,
4),
called
ichnofossils (Greek ikhnos for "track" or "trace")
by geologists, result from the activity of an individual
or group
of organisms who
modify the environment in which they dwell. In this
case, both single and fan-like
branching burrows,
typically marked by transverse ridges (articulations), were generated by
animals tunneling through a muddy and sandy substrate within
a shallow marine environment. (The
background
illustration for this
web page shows a shallow marine substrate covered with
sand-size material somewhat comparable to that Silurian setting
discussed above.)
Over time, the mud turned to
mudstone (shale), and the silt and sand became siltstone and sandstone,
a process geologists call lithification.
As the mudstone weathers away, the trace fossils are exposed on the bottoms
of the siltstone and sandstone layers.
|
What can we say
about the rocks containing
Arthrophycus alleghaniensis?
During the Early Silurian
Period (in lower Paleozoic Era), our part of the northern
Appalachian basin was actually located somewhere between 20° to 25° S latitude (that's below
the Equator). Siliciclastic (quartz-rich) sediment, being eroded
from (the Taconic) highlands to our east (equivalent to off the coast of
New Jersey), was carried by rivers westward across southeastern and central PA toward the shore of a large
(epeiric) sea that covered much of the interior of the US to the west of
us.
Throughout the Ridge and Valley of central PA the Tuscarora Formation comprises interbedded,
quartz-rich sandstone (quartz arenite), siltstone, and mudstone beds. These bedrock
layers were deposited in a variety of shallow, marginal-marine
environments, including tidal channels, barrier bars, tidal flats, and
lagoons.
Here, in this part of
northcentral PA, the Tuscarora Formation underlies the northwestern
ridge of Bald Eagle Mountain and many of the ridges to the south.
In
addition to Arthrophycus,
several other
types of trace fossils are reported in the Tuscarora Fm.; specifically
Cruziana,
Monocraterion,
Planolites, and
Rusophycus (Cotter, 1983).
Trace fossils such as these aid geologists in synthesizing
paleoenvironmental interpretations for geologic units,
including
coastal configuration, water
depth,
and
type of current or wave activity. |
How did
Arthrophycus alleghaniensis
get its name?
The name
Arthrophycus alleghaniensis is the ichnogenus
and ichnospecies designation for this specific trace fossil.
(Arthrophycus, the
ichnogenus name, is used to refer to this general category
of traces, especially if the ichnospecies is unable to be
identified.) In
keeping with the formal classification system (taxonomy)
used by biologists and paleobiologists (paleontologists) for
identifying and naming organisms over the last 300 hundred
years, this and all trace fossils belong to a special category of
fossils formally called ichnofossils.
A. K.
Rindsberg (2001) helps us clarify the taxonomic history
for Arthrophycus alleghaniensis.
This trace fossil was originally named Fucoides
alleghaniensis in 1831 by R. Harlan.
Unfortunately, he
incorrectly
described it as an extinct species of fossil vegetable.
Recognize that at this time the scientific understanding of fossils,
especially trace fossils, was in its infancy.
Notable, however, is the fact that this trace fossil was the
first to be named in North America. Later, in 1852,
noted geologist James Hall supplied the generic ichnogenus name
Arthrophycus, and all subsequent references to this fossil
continue to use this name.
Arthrophycus derives
from the Greek; specifically, "arthro" means joint or
pertaining to the joints, and "phycus" (phŷkos) refers to
seaweed or algae. These traces were originally
interpreted as the remains of plant matter. |
Is
Arthrophycus alleghaniensis
unique to northcentral PA?
The ichnotaxon
Arthrophycus (Arthrophycus
isp.) occurs
in Ordovician-Silurian rocks throughout the Appalachian
Mountains of eastern North America (Ontario-Alabama).
Arthrophycus brongniartii, the second to be named in
North America, has recently been documented from Alabama.
It has, however, also been reported from localities around
the world as well as in both younger and older geologic
sequences. For example,
Arthrophycus alleghaniensis
and Arthrophycus
isp. have been reported from Lower to Middle Ordovician
sequences in
Portugal; a photo of
Arthrophycus from
Libya is included above; and
a new
ichnospecies,
Arthrophycus minimus, has been described from Upper
Cambrian rocks in Argentina. |
What can we say
about the critter who made
Arthrophycus alleghaniensis
?
Published work in
Alabama
suggests that the
animals that made Arthrophycus are
thought to be invertebrate arthropods (perhaps
trilobites).
In 2003, Rindsberg and Martin proposed that a
Raphiophorid trilobite could have been the critter
responsible for these burrows; and they suggest that
Cryptolithus (1,
2) is candidate for the tracemaker of
Arthrophycus (p. 201).
However, no direct
evidence, specifically, no
body fossils have been documented from these rock units to date.
Therefore, anyone who finds such evidence would be making a significant
contribution to the understanding of these specific trace fossils as
well as to the science of paleobiology (paleontology). |
REFERENCES |
Cotter, 1983 |
Cotter, E.,
1983, Shelf, paralic, and fluvial environments and eustatic
sea-level fluctuations in the origin of the Tuscarora Formation
(Lower Silurian) of central Pennsylvania: Journal of Sedimentary
Petrology, v. 53, no. 1, p. 25–49. |
Rindsberg,
2001 |
Rindsberg, A. K.,
November 13, 2001, Arthrophycus or Harlania?:
Posting # 3, Skolithos archives list serve, RedIRIS - Spanish
Academic Network (a forum on trace fossils). |
Rindsberg and
Martin,
2003 |
Rindsberg, A. K.,
and Martin, A. J., 2003, Arthrophycus in the Silurian
of Alabama (USA) and the problem of compound trace fossils:
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 192, p.
187-219. |
Return to
Local GeoNotes
Return to Bald Eagle Geotec Home Page
Last Update:
01/12/10
|